Paintings · Ponderings

Abstract Expressionism: What Does It Mean?

Abstract expressionism is the visual equivalent of Pentecostalism, which is the most successful form of Christianity since early Methodism. Both Ab-ex paintings and Pentacostalism are 20th century forms of Primitivism—efforts to get back to the basics. Pentacostalism stems from an event described in Acts, 2:3 in which the holy Spirit descended upon a group of Christians and they began speaking in “tongues.” Nobody could understand them. Some witnesses said they were drunk, but Peter denied this, pointing out it was only nine o’clock in the morning!

I don’t know of any ab-ex painters who were conventionally religious, but they all seem to have believed their paintings hint at some ineffable meaning of awesome importance. It was a lost cause. Before long, abstraction expressionism lost its position as king of the hill to the comic book clarity of Pop art and the pretentious obscurity of conceptualism, minimalism and all the other isms.

But I keep going back to the abstract-expressionists. I keep thinking some of their scribbles and blobs are better than others, though I can’t tell you why. In any case, I decided to put something understandable into the pentecostal babble of an abstract expressionist painting. Using black enamel, I dripped Jonathan Edwards assertion:“The being of society, as such, is conversation” across my canvas, and then I turned the canvas and dripped Nietzsche’s apposite lament, “I fear we will never get rid of God because we still believe in grammar” across it the other way. I added color and called it Palimpset. I painted it on the kitchen floor of our apartment shortly after we moved to Manhattan in 1990.

In 2018, I belatedly learned I am not the first to insert words into an abstract painting. In 1943, Jackson Pollock wrote his name in big letters on the abstract mural he did for Peggy Guggenheim’s apartment. Then he obscured the letters with swirls and slashes. You can make them out, but it isn’t easy. This was obviously a passive-aggressive advertisement for himself—a message to the world that hadn’t yet recognized that he was a major artist. But I think it was also a message to himself from himself asserting that Jackson Pollock, a boy from a dysfunctional family “out west” was still alive and kicking amid the  “blooming, buzzing confusion” of arty New York. 

cartoons · Poems

Ninnyhammers on the March

Angry Ninnyhammers

The Solution

Reject confusion!
Shutdown debate,
Accept no substitution
For the simplicities of hate.

In college I learned that the school of education allowed unlimited cuts. I immediately transferred to education and stopped going to class. Instead, I drew cartoons for Showme, the campus humor magazine. When I graduated, that was all I knew how to do. Facing a financial crisis during the early years of our marriage, Mary and I started a home based ad agency. I sold our services. This was about as unlikely as seeing a dog with feathers. I‘m no salesman, but the need for money causes us to do strange things. Mary wrote the copy. I drew cartoons.

All that is ancient history, but I am still occasionally inspired to do cartoons to go with little verses. Until quite recently, none of the little verses were political, but, alas, the dolts and ninnyhammers (a word I like but have never had the occasion to use) currently dominating the news cycles have “raised my consciousness.” See above.

Uncategorized

Serendipity!

IMG_2315
Girl Reading, Herbert Knapp

This is a painting of an imaginary female pausing to finish a book as she gets dressed. It happens. I didn’t intend for the painting to illustrate the following poem. Nor did I write the poem to set up the painting. I didn’t realize they fit until just the other day

THE READER

I dive into my book

For one more lap

Before I dress.

 

Eager to finish

what I don’t want to end,

I turn the page.

 

I’ve finished it but sit foreseeing

Futures for the characters

who lived and moved in me and had their being?

 

Their futures fade. I find myself

within my own confusing story wondering

what it’s about and how its going to end.

 

From Reading and Rhyming (forthcoming)

Ponderings

Art and Relics

Stainless Steel Rabbit by Jeff Koons

Not long ago Christies sold this three and a half foot stainless steel rabbit by Jeff Koons for 91 million dollars. It joins a long list of oddities that have been sold as art for astronomical prices. What are the buyers paying for? Writing in The Federalist (May 23, 2019), the art critic, David Marcus, assures us that Koons rabbit is worth the the money because 20th and 21st century art is not about “the adoration of beauty,” but about “the wry smile.” “It’s about being in on the joke. Getting it.”

 The joke seems to be that life is a joke—an ultimately pointless shaggy dog story. Those who are in on the joke smile wryly—ironically. And according to Marcus, in 500 years we will all admire Koons rabbit because we will all see the joke. I don’t believe that. I do not think a wry smile can last 500 years. The ironic secularism of our elites is already under attack from very unironic Muslims, eager to wipe our wry smiles off our faces, and also—though you would never know it from watching the media—from a resurgent Christianity in the world outside an enervated Europe and a confused United States. So how does a sensible person account for the phenomenal prices apparently sane “art collectors” will pay for a dead shark, or a can of an artist’s poop, or a stainless steel rabbit? 

Matthew Bown points out that long before people collected art, they collected relics—the physical remains or personal effects of saints. It was a big business and thousands of faux relics were sold to the faithful for astronomical prices. Because so many Medieval relics were counterfeits, the Protestant reformers referred to them as “precious rubbish.” It is a label that also fits much contemporary art.

Medieval relics were symbols of a culture’s faith. The urinals, bicycle wheels, stuffed sharks, and stainless steel bunnies that pass for art today are relics of our culture’s lack of faith, They are intended to elicit wry smiles from sophisticated unbelievers. 

Which brings us back to the 91 million dollar rabbit. It’s not a rabbit. Look again. It’s an Easter bunny. Koons says he has always loved Surrealism, Dada, and Pop. All three are aggressively anti-religious art movements, reflecting the smug conviction of our elites that religion is the opiate of the masses, and that mankind is the result of a purposeless natural process. Along with this conviction goes a contempt for anyone who believes otherwise.

Thus we have the comic spectacle of bidders at an art auction competing to invest an artistically worthless stainless steel cartoon bunny with value—the only value a secular materialist can understand: money.