Paintings · Ponderings

Finitum Capax Infiniti

This is not the picture I started out to paint. It took on a life of its own. I’m not sure where I came across the phrase on the bowl: finitum capax infiniti. I’m no Latinist. But I read it somewhere and looked it up. It means is we are capable of seeing what is infinite and eternal in things the are fragile and finite. I think that’s true and am reminded of that phrase every time I look at a still life.

Still life paintings depress some people, and I see why. The images of fruit and stemware remind them that real fruit rots and real stemware breaks. You can count on it. But the unreal painted images of fruit and stemware don’t break or rot. They just sit there in another world, and for me they seem to link what is fragile and temporary with what is permanent and  eternal. 

Here is another still life by a much better painter than I am: Anne Vallayer-Coster (1744-1818). She made a speciality of still lifes. Most of her customers were guillotined during the French revolution including her friend and admirer Marie Antoinette, who was a witness at her wedding. But Anne kept out of sight and, against the odds, managed to live and paint again another day.

Ponderings

Art, what is it?

Who knows? Nobody. The Woke are redefining gender, marriage, education, history, politics, manners. What counts as art these days is anybody’s guess.

The poet Phillip Larkin said, “The impulse to preserve lies at the bottom of all art.”

When we value something, we want to save it, to protect it, to make it last. Thus, we protect our own lives, the lives of those we love, certain poems and paintings, certain photographs, and our children’s homework. Art is an object or a performance that defies time—even if it lasts only a minute or two, like a song or a tapdance.

I have just read Henriette Roosenburg’s memoir of her days as a prisoner of the Nazis, The Walls Came Tumbling Down. (Good used copies are available on ABE Books and Alibris.) Henriette and three other girls in the Dutch resistance were caught and condemned to death. But the bureaucrats screwed up and the girls weren’t executed. They were moved from prison to prison, and the paperwork never caught up with them. Freed by the Russians in Eastern Europe, they had no way to get home, and nobody to help. The four scarecrows often sang together. One of their favorites was “Show Me The way to Go Home.”

To preserve a record of their time in prison, Henriette (code name Zip) and the other girls cut squares from their underwear and collected strands of colored thread. Somehow they got hold of needles, and Zip embroidered her square with the name of each prison they passed through, her cell numbers, the dates, her friends names (in Morse), a gun, to show they could hear gunfire, and around edges of the square she embroidered the song title: “We Don’t Know Where We’re Going Until We’re There.” When she got home, she gave this to her mother, who declared while weeping with joy, that Henriette couldn’t have made it, because she never knew in which hand to hold the needle. My contention is that Zip’s embroidered square of underwear is a work of art. We have no aesethetic standards anymore. Consider Duchamp’s urinal, Hirst’s embalmed shark, Manzoni’s cans of excrement, or Judd’s philosophical boxes. Today’s art doesn’t have to be beautiful in a way that Renoir or Rembrandt understood that word. Art in our deconstructed, fragmented, godless age is whatever a person choses to save, protect, and return to. 

However, wealthy people who choose to save, protect, and return to urinals, dead sharks, tins of an artist’s shit, or painted boxes exist beyond the limits of my old fashioned imagination.

Paintings · Ponderings

The Girl In The Mirror

Above is a picture of a woman “making herself up”—i.e. “making something of herself.” She is “painting” herself into existence—creating a work of art.

Raymond Tallis is a doctor of geriatric medicine who branched out as a philosopher, poet and culture critic. He says that art is something—an object or a performance— that “offers us intermittent relief from the otherwise permanent condition of never having been quite there, of not quite arriving.” 

I like that idea. It’s not an idea that we can explain exactly, but we all know what Tallis means by “the permanent condition of not quite arriving.” When the woman in my painting stands up, puts on her clothes, straightens her skirt, and rubs her lips together to smooth her lipstick, she has arrived, even if she hasn’t left the house.

I feel the same way when I finish a painting.

Paintings · Ponderings

“Hopping Home”: One of a Series

Mary insists I name my paintings, so I call this one “Hopping Home.” While we were living in Manhattan we occasionally came across chalked hopscotch diagrams in Riverside Park or even on the sidewalks of side streets. I never saw one in front of a department store, but it could happen. What intrigued me was the way a hopscotch diagram left on the sidewalk tempted grown women to revisit their childhoods by hopping a square or two. (I have seen this happen.) I put mannequins in the display windows to emphasize the physical reality of the woman to the artificiality of the mannequins who know nothing of childhood or of the passage of time.